Oct 20 2025
No Kings II: Jacksonville, Florida
On October 18, 2025, protesters gathered in Jacksonville as part of the No Kings II demonstrations. Here's what they were saying..
Protestors were citing Donald Trump's 34 felony convictions in New York and approximately 91 felony charges across four criminal cases as backdrop for broader concerns about executive overreach. Demonstrators argued the administration has compounded these concerns by bypassing courts, using executive power aggressively, and treating dissent as a threat.
Protesters raised complaints about funding cuts across public institutions, pointing to the freezing of approximately $6.8 billion in K-12 funds, a hold on roughly $6 billion in university research grants across nine institutions, a proposed 26% cut to the Department of Health and Human Services budget, and proposed Medicaid reductions of $700 billion to $1 trillion over ten years. On immigration, demonstrators cited evidence of wrongful deportations and full-body restraints on nonviolent detainees, over 510 credible abuse allegations involving pregnant women and children, and an expansion of mass raids at farms, hotels, and restaurants.

Marchers also alleged suppression of free speech despite the administration's executive order titled "Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship," pointing to the revocation of visas for foreign nationals who posted political criticism online, FCC proceedings opened against media outlets at the administration's request, and the removal of federal web pages covering diversity, environmental protection, and gender identity. On economic policy, demonstrators cited the 2017 tax cuts as favoring top earners, a "gold-card" residency program allowing wealthy foreigners to purchase U.S. residency, and tariff policies they argued burden lower-income households most heavily.

Underlying all of these complaints was a concern about democratic backsliding. Protesters pointed to directives requiring independent agencies to submit regulations for White House review, public attacks on judges who ruled against the administration, replacement of career federal officials with political loyalists, and analyst warnings that U.S. actions are sending signals abroad that embolden authoritarian governments. The administration has disputed many of these characterizations, framing budget cuts as fiscal responsibility, immigration enforcement as upholding existing law, and agency restructuring as modernization rather than politicization.


